The Psychology Behind the Scam

Adequate fraud detection has historically meant anomaly scoring and pattern matching. But when fraud becomes an emotional and psychological weapon, it's time to counter with tools that understand the human mind. That’s where psychosocial fraud detection comes in, a strategy focused not just on what transpired, but why it was about to happen.

What is Psychosocial Fraud Detection?

 Psychosocial fraud detection is a next-generation approach that interprets emotion, cognition, and social context through behavioral science. Instead of treating fraud as a transactional deviation, it treats it as a human story, using sophisticated AI to analyze intent as well as action.

Behavioral Science Foundations

Our engine stands on peer-reviewed pillars: theories that model emotional triggers, cognitive distortions, and moral shifts, each proven to shape fraud dynamics.

emotional fraud detection psychological fraud-1
pexels-thisisengineering-3861958

Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979)

This theory highlights how individuals exhibit loss aversion: we hate losing more than we enjoy winning (Fraud Conference News). In fraud terms, scammers plant urgency (“lose access!”, “pay now or else!”). Fortza Application: tracks behavior like rapid responses, pressure-driven decision patterns, and emotional spikes as predictive indicators.

Anchoring Bias (Tversky & Kahneman)

We fixate on the first piece of information received—even if it's misleading (The Decision Lab). Fortza Application: screens communications for manipulative anchor setups (e.g., fake high prices) and contextual framing tactics.

Social Learning Theory (Bandura et al.)

Behaviors, including deceptive ones, are learned through observation and imitation, we see fraud spread like a meme in real time (ResearchGate). Fortza Application: detects contagion patterns, when fraud tactics replicate across account networks or shared cohorts.

Moral Disengagement Theory (Bandura, 2002)

This describes how individuals justify unethical actions—through justification, minimizing consequences, or diffusing responsibility (Wikipedia). Fortza Application: flags sentiment drift, words and timing that signal users mentally rationalizing breaches of ethics.

FIST Framework (Fraud Intent Signal Taxonomy, 2025)

This new schema breaks fraud into phases, grooming, testing, escalation, with each stage having psychological signatures. Fortza Application: maps behavior across stages, allowing preemptive intervention based on intent, not just outcome.

The Psychosocial Edge

Fraud isn’t just about code or concealed accounts, it’s about trust manipulation, risk perception, and social influence. By embedding behavioral science into machine learning, Fortza:

  • Detects first-time fraudsters outside known algorithms.

  • Spots emotionally manipulated victims in social engineering attacks.

  • Identifies insider threats before rationalizations become actions.

  • Finds synthetic actors exhibiting psychologically inconsistent behavior.

Fraud is Human-First

Fraud today resembles emotional engineering. To stop it, we need more than rules, we need an understanding of human behavior. That's the promise of psychosocial fraud detection: AI that doesn’t just see it, but feels it.

Fortza leads this shift. Because if your fraud tool can’t read people, it can’t read real fraud.

pexels-joshsorenson-1714208